Yeah, because Samsung hasn't sold more computing devices than any other company in history.Yeah because “beating Apple to the market” has been such a successful strategy for Samsung.
Because Samsung doesn't have the #1 smart TV platform right now.
Because Samsung doesn't have the #2 wearables platform right now.
Because Apple hasn't spent the last 6 years copying Samsung's ideas (AMOLED, phablet, stylus, curved screen, smartwatch, AirPods) and won't be taking more in the future (foldables, in-screen fingerprint sensors)
Because Samsung actually hasn't had a better track record in the smart era than Google, and as if Android wouldn't have likely failed had it not been for Samsung's input, and as if other Google products - i.e. Android TV, Android Wear, Chromebooks, Android Things, smart speakers and appliances - wouldn't be a lot better off had Samsung not shunned them in favor of their own products
Apple is #1. Good for them. I participate on this site because I buy their products. But Samsung is a very strong #2 and they are for a reason, holding off or crushing outright formidable competitors like Nokia, Microsoft, Motorola, LG, HTC, Google (who fought a losing battle with Samsung for years that they are still suffering the effects of), Apple (whose legal and PR strategies to drive Samsung from the market failed leaving Apple with "we can't beat them so join them" attitude, which Microsoft later adopted, and note that Microsoft makes Samsung their Android partner, not Google) and Sony for a reason. The only thing that you get out of denying this is frustration.
Samsung Galaxy SmartTag Plus tags with Ultra Wideband launching April 16 - General Discussion Discussions on AppleInsider Forums - AppleInsider
Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment